Hunger Free America, formerly known as The New York City Coalition Against Hunger, is the national leader in media advocacy in the anti-hunger fight, and our original research is the most widely cited data on hunger in New York City.
Past media coverage includes The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Hardball with Chris Matthews, Up with Chris Hayes, The Ed Show, CNN, the NBC Evening News, The New York Times, the Washington Post, USA Today, the Guardian, National Public Radio the Wall Street Journal, NPR, NY1, and many more.
Hunger Free America's research and reports have been at the cutting edge of anti-hunger policy decisions throughout the years. A few of our most influential reports are listed here:
SNAP Declines Yet Hunger Persists:
NYC Caseloads 2012-2016 and the Need to Ease Access to Benefits
By HFA and CUNY
Between 2012 and 2016, New York City experienced a 7.3% decline in participation in the federally-funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), despite 1.2 million city residents living in food insecure households during that time, a level higher than a decade ago. This study analyzed data on SNAP caseloads, economic trends, and surveys of SNAP applicants and participants to better understand the large drop in SNAP participation over this period and to identify strategies to improve access to SNAP benefits for all New Yorkers in need of food assistance.
Read the Full Report Here:
Fighting Poverty with HOPE:
By Joel Berg
Technology has fundamentally revamped the lives of most Americans, usually for the better. Now it’s time to use digital technology – combined with policy improvements – to simplify the lives and boost the long-term self-sufficiency of our lowest-income residents. One powerful way to do this is for our federal, state, and local governments to create online HOPE (Health, Opportunity, and Personal Empowerment) accounts and action plans.
Read the Full Report Here:
Summer Meals Barrier Analysis, 2016
By Christine Binder
This report seeks to answer a basic question: Why do so many low-income children who receive free or reduced price lunch during the school year fail to receive free summer meals? While this study analyzed barriers to participation New York City, its findings have significant implications for summer meals programs sites in urban areas nationwide.
Three out of four New York City public school students are eligible for free or reduced price school meals. One in five New York City children live in food insecure households, meaning that they have limited or uncertain access to food.1 Yet during the summer of 2014, only a quarter (26 percent) of the children who depend on free or reduced-price lunch during the school year also ate lunch through the summer meals program, a federally-funded program delivered primarily by the New York City Department of Education (DOE) School Food.
From Well-Fed to Well-Read:
How the Federal Child Nutrition Reauthorization Bill Can Slash Child Hunger, Reduce Poverty, and Boost Education
By Christine Binder and Joel Berg
To be well read, children must first be well fed. To be schooled, they must be fueled. The United States suffers from high rates of childhood food insecurity and lags behind in educational performance, two highly interconnected problems. The upcoming federal Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR) bill is a crucial opportunity for Congress and the President to ensure that child nutrition programs help all American children reach their maximum potential.
This paper will discuss child hunger in America, how it impacts the health, emotional, and educational well-being of children, and the current state of the major federal child nutrition programs. It will outline the significant policy reforms that, if funded fully, would drastically reduce child hunger.
How the Child and Adult Care Food Program Improves Early Childhood Education
By Christine Binder, Joel Berg, Maryam Adamu, and Katie Hamm June 2015
The upcoming federal child nutrition reauthorization, or CNR, process provides
Congress the opportunity to support early childhood through CACFP. This
report makes a case for why Congress should include provisions in the CNR bill
to reduce participation barriers for programs and providers and maximize the